Menu

Dunlop Sport BluResponse vs Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

4 däck jämförda 3 delade tester Sommar
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Dunlop Sport BluResponse
Sommar · Ultrahög prestanda
Tyre Reviews7.8
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.6
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
2
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
1
Loss
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses

Justera kategoriviktning

Justera vikten av varje prestationskategori för att se hur olika prioriteringar påverkar den övergripande rankningen för alla delade tester.

Torka 35%
Våt 50%
Bekvämlighet 5%
Värde 10%
Torka 35% · Våt 50% · Bekvämlighet 5% · Värde 10%
Finjustera underkategorier
Torka
Våt
Bekvämlighet
Värde
RangTröttaGöraTorkaVåtBekvämlighetVärde
1Kumho Ecsta HS5298.1%99.9%97.6%97.4%94.8%
2Hankook Ventus Prime 497.8%99.4%97.3%96.9%95.8%
3Falken ZIEX ZE310 EcoRun97.5%98.7%98%96.7%91.7%
4Dunlop Sport BluResponse94.8%97.5%93.5%99.2%90.3%

Kategorifördelning

Detaljerade uppdelningar

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Tyre Weight [Kg] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test för test, vinst/oavgjort/förlustresultat
Tester som ingår i denna jämförelse