Menu

Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4

3 däck jämförda 3 delade tester Sommar
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
Sommar · Max prestanda
Tyre Reviews8.1
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
3
Losses
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
1
Win
0
Draws
2
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
1
Loss

Justera kategoriviktning

Justera vikten av varje prestationskategori för att se hur olika prioriteringar påverkar den övergripande rankningen för alla delade tester.

Torka 35%
Våt 50%
Bekvämlighet 5%
Värde 10%
Torka 35% · Våt 50% · Bekvämlighet 5% · Värde 10%
Finjustera underkategorier
Torka
Våt
Bekvämlighet
Värde
RangTröttaGöraTorkaVåtBekvämlighetVärde
1Kumho Ecsta HS5297.6%99.3%96.3%99.3%97.1%
2Hankook Ventus Prime 497.2%99.9%96.5%100%89.4%
3Dunlop SportMaxx RT 296%98.9%97.5%99.1%77.1%

Kategorifördelning

Detaljerade uppdelningar

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test för test, vinst/oavgjort/förlustresultat
RangTröttaVinsterDragarFörluster
1Hankook Ventus Prime 4201
2Kumho Ecsta HS52102
3Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2003
Tester som ingår i denna jämförelse