Menu

Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Bridgestone Turanza 6

3 däck jämförda 4 delade tester Sommar
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Kumho Ecsta HS52
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews9.0
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.9
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
0
Wins
0
Draws
4
Losses
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Bridgestone Turanza 6
Sommar · Premium Touring
Tyre Reviews8.7
Tyre Reviews Scoreout of 10
2
Wins
0
Draws
2
Losses

Justera kategoriviktning

Justera vikten av varje prestationskategori för att se hur olika prioriteringar påverkar den övergripande rankningen för alla delade tester.

Torka 35%
Våt 50%
Bekvämlighet 5%
Värde 10%
Torka 35% · Våt 50% · Bekvämlighet 5% · Värde 10%
Finjustera underkategorier
Torka
Våt
Bekvämlighet
Värde
RangTröttaGöraTorkaVåtBekvämlighetVärde
1Kumho Ecsta HS5299.3%100%99.3%99.5%96.4%
2Bridgestone Turanza 696.2%98.3%96.2%99.6%87%
3Hankook Ventus Prime 496%99.2%94.6%100%90.3%

Kategorifördelning

Detaljerade uppdelningar

Dry Braking [M] (lower is better)
Dry Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Braking [M] (lower is better)
Wet Braking - Concrete [M] (lower is better)
Wet Handling [Km/H] (higher is better)
Wet Circle [m/s] (higher is better)
Straight Aqua [Km/H] (higher is better)
Curved Aquaplaning [m/sec2] (higher is better)
Noise [dB] (lower is better)
Wear [KM] (higher is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Value [Price/1000] (lower is better)
Price (lower is better)
Rolling Resistance [kg / t] (lower is better)
Fuel Consumption [l/100km] (lower is better)
Abrasion [mg/km/t] (lower is better)
Test för test, vinst/oavgjort/förlustresultat
RangTröttaVinsterDragarFörluster
1Kumho Ecsta HS52202
2Bridgestone Turanza 6202
3Hankook Ventus Prime 4004
Tester som ingår i denna jämförelse